The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) was
designed to help more Americans have health insurance. It mandated that people
have coverage. It made health care insurance easier to obtain. It also expanded
Medicaid to cover lower-income people, established state marketplaces for
purchasing insurance and provided subsidies to help cover the cost of premiums.
It also prohibited insurance companies from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. The policy goal was clear: Provide health insurance to as many Americans as possible to help pay for medical procedures.
It also prohibited insurance companies from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. The policy goal was clear: Provide health insurance to as many Americans as possible to help pay for medical procedures.
It is important to remember that as the
new Republican Congress and Executive branch move aggressively to repeal ACA -
it was the Republicans that first put forth the basic tenants of the ACA back
1993. This was based on ideas the conservative Heritage Foundation put forth
the their 1989 lecture entitled “Assuring Affordable Health Care
for All Americans” written by Stuart M. Butler which included the idea of universal health care for all Americans.
We
would add to the notion of universal health care the overwhelming need to
promote good health among Americans. Think of this as a “wellness dividend,” as
a public good - one that could benefit the entire spectrum of Americans. It
would deliver the dual-benefit of improved productivity and reduced health care
costs if people simply don’t get sick as often as they do now due to poor
health (from being over-weight, smoking, eating poorly, substance addiction,
etc)
The
Repeal of the Affordable Care Act
Now here comes the new Republican
majority US congress and the Trump Administration and their efforts to repeal
the ACA. A non-partisan Congressional Budget Office study
just reported that 18 million people could lose their insurance within a year
when this happens, and insurance premiums are likely to shoot upward if
Congress repeals the ACA. Later, after the elimination of ACA’s expansion of
Medicaid eligibility and subsidies for insurance purchased through ACA
marketplaces, the number would increase to 54 million and then to 59 million in
2026.
Repealing the
penalties that enforce the “individual mandate” would “both reduce the number
of people purchasing health insurance and change the mix of people with
insurance,” as younger and healthier people with low health costs would be more
likely to go without insurance, the budget office said.
How many are at risk due to pre-existing conditions?
Before the Affordable
Care Act was passed, many Americans faced being denied coverage from a new
health insurer if they had a pre-existing medical condition. The ACA provision
requiring insurers to cover everyone, regardless of pre-existing conditions, is
a very popular component of the law.
The Kaiser Family
Foundation projects
that if the pre-existing conditions provision is repealed, 52 million Americans
could be at risk of being denied coverage in the future.
The foundation
concluded that in 11 states at least three in every 10 non-elderly adults would
have this type of pre-existing conditions: WV, MS, KY, AL, AK, TN, OK, LA, MO,
IN, KS – ironically all states that voted from Trump. Guess those voters missed
the fine print on this issue.
What about the impact for people on Medicare?
A full ACA repeal
will definitely impact a vast majority of Americans who are over 65 years of
age and on Medicare.
A repeal will restore
higher payments for the services performed under the managed care part of
Medicare known as Medicare Advantage (which delivers extra coverage, like
vision, hearing, dental, prescription drugs and health / wellness programs) per
Kaiser. This will in turn lead to higher premiums for the people signed up with
these programs.
The big ACA repeal
whammy will be the reversal of efforts to close the “donut hole” for
prescription drugs. One part of ACA dramatically cut the amount Seniors pay for
prescription drugs. The “donut hole” existed before ACA when beneficiaries got
some coverage up to a certain dollar amount, and then got none until a higher
dollar catastrophic coverage provision kicked in.
How much more will Americans have to pay out of pocket?
According to a Commonwealth Fund - Rand study released last fall, the current policyholder who purchased coverage on one of the marketplaces spends on average $3,200 in out of pocket costs annually for the premium and other costs, such as co-payments.
The study found that repealing ACA alone without a replacement plan would increase out-of-pocket costs to $4,700 per year.
Some replacement scenarios could produce a larger increase while some could result in smaller increases the study said.
The study found that repealing ACA alone without a replacement plan would increase out-of-pocket costs to $4,700 per year.
Some replacement scenarios could produce a larger increase while some could result in smaller increases the study said.




No comments:
Post a Comment